As I finish up with the last week
of this course, I admit that my knowledge about how people learn is more
profound than I expected it would be eight weeks ago. After reflecting on each
completed assignment, I have to say that I am most surprised by how it is
possible to combine learning theories from the past with technology of the
future to design instruction for adult learners. Though there is still much to
learn about learning theories and instruction, I feel that this course helped
me to better understand my own personal learning process and gave me a solid
foundation that I will be able to apply towards creating instruction for
others. In this reflection, I will further discuss how my learning in this
course will help me to enter into the field of instructional design.
First, I would like to further
explain why the combination of new technology and old learning theories is
surprising to me. For example, we learned about the Behaviorist Theory that
focuses mostly on how learning is explained by observing behaviors of a learner
within its environment. In the beginning, I could not find much of a connection
between this theory and the online learning technology that is my preferred
learning tool. Then it dawned on me that the study of behaviorism could very
well have led to the creation of programmed instruction. Computer assisted
instruction and tutorials allow for students to process information
systematically and then receive immediate feedback for their answers, which
fits B.F. Skinner’s notion of operant conditioning. Revelations like this
certainly helped to keep me engaged in the class, because I felt that I was
making connections with information that was new to me.
Additionally, I am happy to admit
that this course has deepened my understanding of my personal learning process,
which will help me to relate to other learners. In the sixth week we were encouraged
to recognize differences in learning styles, and I found this lesson helpful in
discovering additional insight into what helps my learning process. Of the
theories listed by Dr. Ormrod (2009) in the Learning Styles and Strategies video, Mnemonics was my favorite model to discover
as a learning style that I have been using successfully for years. I believe
that I can use my increased knowledge of different learning styles and multiple
intelligences to improve my own learning experience at Walden University while
learning to design balanced instruction for others.
I have also learned that there are
many connections between learning theories, styles, technology, and motivation.
It will be a goal of mine, as an instructional designer, to combine these items
together when creating instruction. For example, it is possible to create
instruction that blends theories from Piaget, Vygosky, Gery into an
Internet-based activity that includes social network connections and Intrinsic
motivation. As argued by Jared Carman (2002), “that some of the best-designed
learning experiences draw on a blend of learning theories and philosophies.”
As for using the knowledge that I
have gained in this course to help my career in the field of Instructional
Design, I will attempt to apply the knowledge I have learned from our lessons
in future interviews with hiring managers within the field. Overall, I feel
that I am now better prepared to control the direction of my career.
Reference:
Carman, J. (2002, August). Blended Learning
Design: Five Key Ingredients. Retrieved from http://www.agilantlearning.com/pdf/Blended%20Learning%20Design.pdf
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009). Learning Styles and Strategies. [DVD]. Baltimore, MD: Dr Jeanne Ormrod